Planning to establish or expand a business in Thailand? Kinnaree helps foreign investors assess their options, structure their market entry, and navigate the practical requirements of doing business in Thailand. Contact our team to discuss your plans and explore the right approach for your business.
For companies with a Thai-majority structure, there’s a moment that eventually arrives: a share transfer needs registering, a director changes, or a bank asks a Thai shareholder to explain a deposit. Suddenly, the paperwork that seemed settled at incorporation is back under review. In Thailand, this isn’t a rare event. It’s a recurring one, and understanding what triggers it is the first step to avoiding it.
What a review actually involves
Authorities don’t need to launch a formal investigation to examine a company’s structure. Three routine events can prompt closer scrutiny:
- Annual filings. Audited financial statements and tax returns are required every year. When a company comes under scrutiny, investigators may review two years of these records at once.
- Corporate changes. Any amendment to the articles, share transfer, director change, or capital increase can trigger a fresh review of who really controls the company.
- Property transactions. For companies holding land, every purchase, sale, or mortgage can be cross-checked against corporate filings and shareholder data.
Because these events can occur naturally within a two-year window for active companies, a structure that looked fine at incorporation can become a liability if the paperwork no longer reflects the underlying arrangement.
What reviewers are looking for
At the center of every review is the same question: do Thai shareholders on paper reflect genuine ownership? A nominee structure is one where Thai shareholders hold the majority stake but have little real involvement, such as no meaningful capital contribution, no say in decisions, or profits that flow disproportionately to a foreign investor through side agreements, powers of attorney, or informal loans that are never repaid.
Reviewers may examine bank records for the genuine source of funds, meeting minutes for actual participation, and dividend history for consistency with shareholding.
Avoiding the review altogether: know your options upfront
The most reliable way to manage this risk isn’t to manage a nominee structure carefully. It’s to avoid needing one in the first place. Many business activities in Thailand aren’t restricted under the Foreign Business Act, meaning 100% foreign ownership is possible from day one.
For restricted activities, several transparent routes can allow foreign control without a Thai majority:
- A Foreign Business Licence (FBL), granted case by case where the business demonstrates clear benefit to Thailand and available for many List 3 activities.
- Board of Investment (BOI) promotion, which can permit full foreign ownership for qualifying priority sectors, often with additional incentives.
- Treaty of Amity provisions, available to qualifying US investors across many sectors.
- Special economic zones and sector exemptions, which can relax ownership rules for defined industries or locations.
Mapping a planned activity against these options first can determine whether a two-year review becomes a concern at all.
Where a Thai partner is genuinely wanted
If a restricted activity requires a Thai partner, the arrangement needs real, ongoing substance: actual capital contributed by the Thai shareholder, documented governance participation, and dividends proportionate to shareholding. This needs to be maintained continuously, since these are exactly the areas that can be re-examined during a review.
Holding property without building in risk
For real estate, safer routes can avoid an opaque holding company, including condominium ownership within the foreign quota, registered leasehold, or usufruct arrangements.
The two-year review isn’t a one-time hurdle. It can be part of the ongoing scrutiny surrounding companies with Thai-majority structures. Structuring correctly from the outset, with the full range of legal options in view, can help businesses reduce regulatory risk and build a more sustainable presence in Thailand.
Sources
This article draws on recent guidance and enforcement updates from Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) and related agencies, which show that nominee‑style structures are actively screened through annual filings, corporate amendments, and property transactions, with authorities cross‑checking financial statements, shareholder records, and bank statements to verify genuine Thai investment and control. It also reflects the framework of the Foreign Business Act (FBA), which defines “foreign” by both shareholding and control, explicitly prohibits nominee arrangements, and allows 100% foreign ownership where activities are unrestricted or where exemptions apply via Foreign Business Licences, BOI promotion, Treaty of Amity, or sector/zone rules. For property, it incorporates current enforcement trends around company‑held land and the safer foreign options of condominium units within the 49% foreign quota, registered leaseholds, and usufructs.